Family stories evolve and change over time. Problems such as memory distortion, lack of primary source documentation, and the unintentional blending of multiple narratives contribute to the morphing of intergenerational stories. Over time, family stories can become altered, and historical accuracy gets replaced by fictionalized tradition. It is common for family stories to include historical inaccuracies. Such an evolution usually takes place in oral traditions, but many family stories get written down, making them easily shared and more readily accepted as accurate depictions of the past, notwithstanding any potential errors. Concerning the perpetuation of pioneer1 family stories, Keith A. Erekson recently advised, “We should cherish what is correct (the truth), recover what has been omitted (the whole truth), and remove what was added later (nothing but the truth).”2 But doing so is not always simply accomplished. Sometimes errors in family stories are not minor, and the inaccuracies not...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
July 01 2024
Mammy Chloe: Removing Fiction From Nonfictional Family Stories
Emily Marie Crumpton-Deason
Emily Marie Crumpton-Deason
EMILY MARIE CRUMPTON-DEASON works for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ Church History Library as a church history consultant. She holds degrees in history from Idaho State University and Utah State University. Her research interests include nineteenth-century media, crime, mortality, gender, and Latter-day Saint pioneer history.
Search for other works by this author on:
Utah Historical Quarterly (2024) 92 (3): 196–213.
Citation
Emily Marie Crumpton-Deason; Mammy Chloe: Removing Fiction From Nonfictional Family Stories. Utah Historical Quarterly 1 July 2024; 92 (3): 196–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.5406/26428652.92.3.01
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Total Views
18
10
Pageviews
8
PDF Downloads
Since 9/1/2024