Abstract
This article examines and critiques Fröding and Peterson’s account of friendship as developed in their article "Animal Ethics Based on Friendship." I argue that their central claim--that mutual benefit provides a suitable basis for friendship between human and nonhumans--is untenable, and I identify the general contours of a more satisfactory way of thinking about friendship between humans and nonhumans.
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Copyright 2011 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
2011
You do not currently have access to this content.