It is often argued by educators and researchers that access to the arts leads to increased academic performance. However, it is not clear why such access does so. We here use autopoietic enactive embodied cognition and ecological psychology to explain the relationship between dance training and conceptual problem-solving. We investigate four features of dance training that are beneficial for conceptual problem-solving and critical thinking: empathy, affordance exploration, attention change, and habit breaking. In each case, we will see that the embodied sensorimotor skills developed through dance practice are a form of affordance exploration that can carry over into the realm of conceptual problem-solving. Hence, since some of the skills needed in conceptual problem-solving are the same ones developed and trained through dancing, when we train dance, we also train some of the relevant skills for conceptual problem-solving and critical thinking.

The text of this article is only available as a PDF.


1. For related discussions, please see Edward Fiske, Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning (Washington, DC: President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities and Arts Education Partnership, 1999); Nick Rabkin and Robin Redmond, “The Arts Make a Difference,” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 36, no. 1 (2006): 25-32; Brian Caldwell and Tanya Vaughan, Transforming Education through the Arts (London: Routledge, 2012); Kylie Peppler, Christy Wessel Powell, Naomi Thompson, and James Catterall, “Positive Impact of Arts Integration on Student Academic Achievement in English Language Arts,” The Educational Forum 78, no. 4 (2014): 364-77; Daniel Bowen, Jay P. Greene, and Brian Kisida, “Learning to Think Critically: A Visual Art Experiment,” Educational Researcher 43, no. 1 (2014): 37-44; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education: Branches from the Same Tree (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018); Daniel Bowen and Brian Kisida, “Arts Education; ‘Investigating Causal Effects of Arts Education Experiences: Experimental Evidence from Houston’s Arts Access Initiative,” Education Week 38, no. 24 (2019): https://kinder.rice.edu/research/investigating-causal-effects-arts-education-experiences-experimental-evidence-houstons-arts.
2. Please refer to Richard Deasy, ed., Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development (Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership, 2002); Sandra Minton, “Assessment of High School Students’ Creative Thinking Skills: A Comparison of Dance and Nondance Classes,” Research in Dance Education 4, no. 1 (2003): 31-49; Miriam Giguere, “Thinking as They Create: Do Children Have Similar Experiences in Dance and in Language Arts?” Journal of Dance Education 6, no. 2 (2006): 41-47; Judith Lynne Hanna, “A Nonverbal Language for Imagining and Learning: Dance Education in K-12 Curriculum,” Educational Researcher 37, no. 8 (2008): 491-506; Lara Tembrioti, “Reflective Practice in Dance: A Review of the Literature,” Research in Dance Education 15, no. 1 (2014): 4-22; Jan Deans, “Thinking, Feeling and Relating: Young Children Learning through Dance,” Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 41, no. 3 (2016): 46-57.
3. James Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston: Lawrence Erlbaum Inc. Publishers, 1979).
4. Francisco J. Verela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch, Embodied Mind, rvd. ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991), 203.
5. Sanneke de Haan, Erik Rietveld, Martin Stokhof, and Damiaan Denys, “The Phenomenology of Deep Brain Stimulation-Induced Changes in OCD: An Enactive Affordance-Based Model,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013): 653.
6. Erik Rietveld and Julian Kiverstein, “A Rich Landscape of Affordances,” Ecological Psychology 26, no. 4 (2014): 325-52.
7. Maria Brincker, “Navigating Beyond ‘Here and Now’ Affordances—on Sensorimotor Maturation and ‘False Belief’ Performance,” Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014): 1433; Shaun Gallagher, “The Therapeutic Reconstruction of Affordances,” Res Philosophica 95, no. 4 (2018): 719-36.
8. Gallagher, “The Therapeutic Reconstruction,” 723.
9. Thomas Fuchs, Ecology of the Brain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 46.
10. Verela, Thompson, and Rosch, Embodied Mind, 203; Anthony Chemero, Radical Embodied Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009); Daniel Hutto and Erik Myin, Radicalizing Enactivism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013); Daniel Hutto and Erik Myin, Evolving Enactivism: Basic Minds Meet Content (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017); Shaun Gallagher, Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).
11. Evan Thompson, Mind in Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007); Humberto R. Maturana and Francisco J. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cognition, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 42 (Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980).
12. Michelle Maiese, Embodied Selves and Divided Minds (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 22.
13. Kevin J. O’Regan, and Alva Noë, “A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, no. 5 (2001): 939-73; Alva Noë, Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness (New York: Hill and Wang, 2009).
14. Lambros Malafouris, How Things Shape the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013).
15. Malafouris, How Things Shape the Mind, 220.
16. Hutto and Myin, Evolving Enactivism, 195.
17. Hanna De Jaegher, Ezequiel Di Paolo, and Shaun Gallagher, “Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14, no. 10 (2010): 441-47.
18. Colwyn Trevarthen, “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy: A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity,” in Before Speech: The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication, ed. Margaret Bullowa (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1979), 321.
19. Colwyn Trevarthen and Penelope Hubley, “Secondary Intersubjectivity: Confidence, Confiding and Acts of Meaning in the First Year,” in Action, Gesture and Symbol, ed. J. Lock (London: Academic Press, 1978), 183.
20. Hanna De Jaegher and Ezequiel Di Paolo, “Participatory Sense-Making,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6, no. 4 (2007): 485-507, at 490.
21. Daniel C. Richardson, Rick Dale, and Natasha Z. Kirkham, “The Art of Conversation Is Coordination: Common Ground and the Coupling of Eye Movements during Dialogue,” Psychological Science 18, no. 5 (2007): 407-13; Max M. Louwerse, Rick Dale, Ellen G. Bard, and Patrick Jeuniaux, “Behavior Matching in Multimodal Communication Is Synchronized,” Cognitive Science 36, no. 8 (2012): 1404-26; Drew Abney, Alexandra Paxton, Rick Dale, and Christopher Kello, “Movement Dynamics Reflect a Functional Role for Weak Coupling and Role Structure in Dyadic Problem Solving,” Cognitive Processing 16, no. 4 (2015): 325-32; Deborah Tollefsen and Rick Dale, “Naturalizing Joint Action: A Process-Based Approach,” Philosophical Psychology 25, no. 3 (2012), 385-407.
22. De Jaegher and Di Paolo, “Participatory Sense-Making,” 493.
23. De Jaegher, Di Paolo, and Gallagher, “Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition?”
24. Gallagher, Enactivist Interventions, 77-78.
25. Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, The Primacy of Movement (Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2011), 422.
26. Michele Merritt, “Thinking-Is-Moving: Dance, Agency, and a Radically Enactive Mind,” Phenomenological Cognitive Science 14 (2013): 95-110, at 98.
27. Merritt, “Thinking-Is-Moving,” 99.
28. Vida Midgelow, “Improvisation as Paradigm for Phenomenologies,” in Back to Dance itself—Phenomenologies of the Body in Performance, ed. Sondra Fraleigh (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2018), 59-77, at 64.
29. Midgelow, “Improvisation as Paradigm for Phenomenologies,” 64.
30. Ann Cooper Albright, “Feeling in and Out: Contact Improvisation and the Politics of Empathy,” in Touching and Being Touched: Kinesthesia and Empathy in Dance and Movement, ed. Gabriele Brandstetter, Gerko Egert, and Sabine Zuabrik (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2013), 263-74; also published in Zwischenleiblichkeit und bewegtes Verstehen—Intercorporeity, Movement and Tacit Knowledge, ed. Undine Eberlein (Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2016), 289-98.
31. Lara Tembrioti, “Reflective Practice in Dance: A Review of the Literature,” Research in Dance Education 15, no. 1 (2014): 4-22.
32. Norma Deitch Feshbach and Seymour Feshbach, “Empathy and Education,” in The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, ed. Decety Jean and William Ickes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009); Marianne van Woerkom, “Critical Reflection as a Rationalistic Ideal,” Adult Education Quarterly 60, no. 4 (2010): 339-56; Edward W. Taylor and Patricia Cranton, “A Theory in Progress? Issues in Transformative Learning Theory,” European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 4, no. 1 (2013): 33.
33. Darlene Bonner and David Aspy, “A Study of the Relationship between Student Empathy and GPA,” The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development 22, no. 4 (1984): 149-54; Norma Deitch Feshbach and Seymour Feshbach, “Affective Processes and Academic Achievement,” Child Development 58, no. 5 (1987): 1335-47; Alfie Kohn, “Caring Kids: The Role of the Schools,” The Phi Delta Kappan 72, no. 7 (1991): 496-506; Norma Deitch Feshbach and R. Konrad, “Modifying Aggression and Social Prejudice: Findings and Challenges,” Aggressive Behavior 27, no. 3 (2001): 206; Christine Jarvis, “Fiction, Empathy and Lifelong Learning,” International Journal of Lifelong Education 31, no. 6 (2012): 743-58; Maureen Linker, Intellectual Empathy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 201); David Ampuero, Christian E. Miranda, Luisa E. Delgado, Samantha Goyen, and Sean Weaver, “Empathy and Critical Thinking: Primary Students Solving Local Environmental Problems through Outdoor Learning,” Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning 15, no. 1 (2015): 64-78.
34. Gallagher, Enactivist Interventions.
35. Karsten R. Stueber, Rediscovering Empathy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006). Giovanna Colombetti, The Feeling Body (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014).
36. Dee Reynolds, “Empathy, Contagion and Affect,” in Touching and Being Touched (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013), 211-32.
37. Aili Bresnahan, “Perceiving Live Improvisation in the Performing Arts,” in Perception, Cognition and Aesthetics, ed. Dena Shottenkirk, Manuel Corado, and Steven S. Gouveia (New York: Routledge, 2019), 113-14.
38. Bresnahan, “Perceiving Live Improvisation,” 114-15.
39. Guido Orgs, Jan-Henryk Dombrowski, Martin Heil, and Petra Jansen-Osmann, “Expertise in Dance Modulates Alpha/Beta Event-Related Desynchronization during Action Observation,” The European Journal of Neuroscience 27, no. 12 (2008): 3380; Seon Hee Jang, and Frank E. Pollick, “Experience Influences Brain Mechanisms of Watching Dance,” Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 29, no. 2 (2011): 352-77; Falisha J. Karpati, Chiara Giacosa, Nicholas E. V. Foster, Virginia B. Penhune, and Krista L. Hyde, “Dance and the Brain: A Review,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1337, no. 1 (2015): 140-46.
40. Beatriz Calvo-Merino, D. E. Glaser, J. Grèzes, R. E. Passingham, and P. Haggard, “Action Observation and Acquired Motor Skills: An fMRI Study with Expert Dancers,” Cerebral Cortex 15, no. 8 (2005): 1243-49.
41. Hanna, “A Nonverbal Language for Imagining and Learning.”
42. Deans, “Thinking, Feeling and Relating.”
43. Shaun Gallagher and Robb Lindgren, “Enactive Metaphors: Learning through Full-Body Engagement,” Educational Psychology Review 27, no. 3 (2015): 391-404.
44. Giguere, “Thinking as They Create.”
45. Calvo-Merino et al., “Action Observation”; Beatriz Calvo-Merino, Julie Grèzes, Daniel E. Glaser, Richard E. Passingham, and Patrick Haggard, “Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation,” Current Biology 16, no. 19 (10, 2006): 1905-10; Emily S. Cross, Antonia F. de C Hamilton, and Scott T. Grafton, “Building a Motor Simulation De Novo: Observation of Dance by Dancers,” Neuroimage 31, no. 3 (2006): 1257-67.
46. For a review of the literature, see Falisha J. Kaparti et al., “Dance and the Brain: A Review,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1337 (2015): 140-46.
47. Lavinia Teixeira-Machado, Ricardo Mario Arida, and Jair de Jesus Mari, “Dance for Neuroplasticity: A Descriptive Systematic Review,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 96 (2019): 232-40.
48. Jill Brown, Gloria Stillman, and Sandra Herbert, “Can the Notion of Affordances Be of Use in the Design of a Technology Enriched Mathematics Curriculum,” Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2004, https://merga.net.au/Public/Publications/Annual_Conference_Proceedings/2004_MERGA_CP.aspx, accessed July 27, 2020; Laurie D. Edwards, Francesca Ferrara, and Deborah Moore Russo, Emerging Perspectives on Gesture and Embodiment in Mathematics, in International Perspectives on Mathematics Education—Cognition, Equity and Society (Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Incorporated, 2014); Aibhín Bray, and Brendan Tangney, “Enhancing Student Engagement through the Affordances of Mobile Technology: A Twenty-First-Century Learning Perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education,” Mathematics Education Research Journal 28, no. 1 (2016): 173-97.
49. George Lakoff and Rafael E. Núñez, Where Mathematics Comes From (New York: Basic Books, 2008), 28.
50. Michael L. Anderson, After Phrenology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014).
51. Susan Goldin-Meadow and Melissa A. Singer, “From Children’s Hands to Adults’ Ears,” Developmental Psychology 39, no. 3 (2003): 509-20.
52. Anne Lafay, Helena P. Osana, and Marion Valat, “Effects of Interventions with Manipulatives on Immediate Learning, Maintenance, and Transfer in Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review,” Education Research International 2019: 1-21; https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2019/2142948/, accessed July 27, 2020.
53. Patricia S. Moyer-Packenham, E. K. Bullock, J. F. Shumway, S. I. Tucker, et al., “The Role of Affordances in Children’s Learning Performance and Efficiency when Using Virtual Manipulative Mathematics Touch-Screen Apps,” Mathematics Education Research Journal 28, no. 1 (2016): 79.
54. David Bertolo, Jerome Dinet, and Robin Vivian, “Reducing Cognitive Workload during 3D Geometry Problem-Solving with an App on iPad,” The Science and Information (SAI) Organization, August 2014; https://www.research.gate.net/profile/Jerome_Dinet/publication/261362194_Reducing_Cognitive_Workload_During_3D_Geometry_Problem_Solving_with_an_App_on_iPad/links/0deec5363f3420807d000000.pdf, accessed July 27, 2020.
55. Robert Goldstone and David Landy, How Much of Symbolic Manipulation Is Just Symbol Pushing? (eScholarship, University of California, 2009), https://escholarship.org/uc/item/91w5m70d, accessed July 27, 2020; David Landy and Robert Goldstone, “Formal Notations are Diagrams: Evidence from a Production Task,” Memory and Cognition 35, no. 8 (2007a): 2033-40.
56. David Landy and Robert L. Goldstone, “How Abstract Is Symbolic Thought?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33, no. 4 (2007): 720-33.
57. David Landy and Sally Linkenauger, Arithmetic Notation … Now in 3D (eScholarship, University of California, 2010), https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6z35301q, accessed July 27, 2020.
58. Anderson, After Phrenology, 235.
59. Sally Doughty, “I Notice that I’m Noticing,” in The Oxford Handbook of Improvisation in Dance, ed. Vida Midgelow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).
60. Doughty, “I Notice that I’m Noticing,” 127.
61. Erin Manning, Politics of Touch (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007).
62. Louise McDowall, “Exploring Uncertainties of Language in Dance Improvisation,” in The Oxford Handbook of Improvisation in Dance, ed. Vida Midgelow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 189.
63. Minton, “Assessment of High School Students’ Creative Thinking Skills.”
This content is made freely available by the publisher. It may not be redistributed or altered. All rights reserved.