Abstract
This paper critically surveys 20 years of recent work on radical skepticism. It focuses on three key issues. First, it starts by exploring how philosophers have recently challenged our understanding of radical skeptical arguments. It then unpacks and critically evaluates some influential reactions to radical skepticism: structuralism, knowledge-first epistemology, epistemological disjunctivism, and hinge epistemology. Third, it explores some novel developments of pragmatism, like pragmatic skepticism, gauges its anti-skeptical import, and reflects on the ways in which radical skeptical epistemology and ethics might meet.
Skeptical arguments, Pragmatic skepticism, Knowledge-first epistemology, Virtue epistemology, Hinge epistemology, Ethics of skepticism
© 2023 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
2023
You do not currently have access to this content.