The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Footnotes
1 See Musa W. Dube,
Postcolonial Feminist Interpretation of the Bible
(St Louis
: Chalice
, 2000
), 197
.2 It was directed by Ridley Scott, who directed Gladiator, and was released on 12 December 2014.
3 See Dube,
Postcolonial Feminist Interpretation
, 197
–201
, where I began proposing a luta continua hermeneutics.4 The term “trickster intellectuals,” as used here, is drawn from Nadia Naar Gada, who uses it to describe creative writers of postliberation disappointments, as they apply their work to engage critically the unjust structures of the postindependence nation-state headed by heroes of the liberation (
“Modern African Literature Revisited: A Study of Literary Affinities in Selected Early Novels”
[PhD diss.
, Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou
, 2014
]). In this response, the trickster intellectuals and communities represent those who remain vigilant and critical of all structures of oppression in their worlds.5 See Musa W. Dube,
“Divining Ruth for International Relations,”
in Postmodern Interpretations of the Bible
, ed. A. K. M. Adam (St Louis
: Chalice
, 2001
), 67
–80
, where I propose divination as a framework of reading.6 The trickster as a border crosser and an ambiguous figure has been read in two ways—articulating the position of the vulnerable and powerless as well as representing the powerful, who trick everyone for their own ends. In the postwar and postindependence context, some critics have seen the ruling elites as tricksters who have tricked all members of the nation for their own ends. Colonizers who came as minorities and tricked the majority by dispossessing them of the lands have also been read as tricksters. See, e.g., Tinyiko S. Maluleke,
“Of Lions and Rabbits: The Role of the Church in Reconciliation in South Africa,”
IRM
96
, no. 380/381
(2007
): 41
–55
. There will always be multiple ways of reading trickster figures, depending on the contexts and agendas of readers. As said above, in this article trickster intellectuals and communities refer to those who remain vigilant and critical toward all structures of oppression in their worlds.7 See Frederick Cooper,
“Decolonization in Africa: An Interpretation,”
in Africana: The Encyclopaedia of the African and African American Experience
, ed. Kwame Anthony Appiah and Henry Louis Gates Jr. (New York
: Basic Civitas Books
, 1999
), 571
–82
.8 For the historical narration that follows, see the appropriate entries in Appiah and Gates,
Africana: The Encyclopaedia
.9 See Eric Young,
“Africa: Mozambique,”
in Appiah and Gates, Africana: The Encyclopaedia
, 1351
–55
.10 See Elisabeth Heath,
“Africa: Colonial Rule,”
in Appiah and Gates, Africana: The Encyclopaedia
, 485
–89
.11 Heath writes that “the logic of indirect rule was first articulated by F. J. D. Lugard,” who “recommended that colonial powers take advantage of existing African authority structures.… Under indirect rule tribal authorities rather than European personnel would be given responsibility for regional administration and justice … while encouraging their subjects to appreciate modern European values” (ibid.,
486
–87
).12 Kate Tuttle,
“Africa: Rwanda,”
in Appiah and Gates, Africana: The Encyclopaedia
, 1648
–53
.13 See Eric Young,
“Africa: Zimbabwe,”
in Appiah and Gates, Africana: The Encyclopaedia
, 2049
–53
.14 See Eric Young,
“Robert Mugabe,”
in Appiah and Gates, Africana: The Encyclopaedia
, 1357
–58
.15 Ibid.,
1358
.16 See Grace Wamue and Matthew M. Theuri, eds.,
Quests for Integrity in Africa
, African Christianity (Nairobi
: Acton
, 2003
).17 Ezra Chitando and Sophia Chirongoma, eds.,
Justice Not Silence: Churches Facing Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
(Cape Town
: SUN
, 2013
).18 See Eric Young,
“Africa: Nambia,”
in Appiah and Gates, Africana: The Encyclopaedia
, 1380
–84
.19 See Tinyiko S. Maluleke,
“Dealing Lightly with the Wound of My People: TRC Process in Theological Perspective,”
Missionalia
25
.3
(1997
): 324
–42
.20 Be that as it may, critics of the Truth and Reconciliation project hold that it was emotionally and historically important, but it has not addressed the prevailing structural inequalities of the apartheid regime—particularly, land remains in the hands of the white minority South Africans. See the engagement with the current neoliberal economies and its impact on the majority, who remain marginalized from economic resources, in ANSA Secretariat,
Alternatives to Neoliberalism in Southern Africa: Towards a People Driven Development Agenda
(Harare
: SATUCC
, 2007
).21 See Dube,
Postcolonial Feminist Interpretation
, 197
.22 See Musa W. Dube,
“Decolonizing the Darkness,”
in Soundings in Cultural Criticism: Perspectives and Methods in Culture, Power, and Identity in the New Testament
, ed. Francisco Lozada Jr. and Greg Carey (Minneapolis
: Fortress
, 2013
), 31
–45
.23 Avtar Brah argues that, with the historical and contemporary movements of people, both indigenous and immigrants need to construct their identities and spaces along the framework of diaspora (
“Diaspora, Border and Transnational Identities,”
in Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader
, ed. Reina Lewis and Sara Mills [New York
: Routledge
, 2003
], 613
–34
). She holds that diaspora space is “the site where the native is as much a diasporian as the diasporian is the native” (p. 632
).24 See Peter Tosh, studio album,
Equal Rights
, recorded at Randy's Studio, Kingston, Jamaica, 1977.25 For detailed discussions of ubuntu, see
“The Primacy of Ubuntu in African Ethics,”
in Munyaradzi Felix Murove, African Ethics: An Anthology of Comparative and Applied Ethics
(Pietermaritzburg
: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press
, 2009
), 61
–110
.26 Such a philosophy works best when adhered to by all members of the community. In cases where it is received but not given, practitioners of ubuntu become vulnerable. A good example is the colonial case, where African people welcomed foreign nations into their communities and kingdoms, allowed them to settle and gave them land, only to find themselves dispossessed of their lands. Nonetheless, the validity of ubuntu remains, reminding us of the value of defining ourselves through the capacity to receive and welcome the Other who is different from us. Such an ethical stance offers a possibility of building liberating communities.
27 See Joyce Hope-Scott,
“The Animal Trickster as Political Satirist and Social Dissident: An Analysis of Luek—the Hare in Birago Diop's Tales of Amadou Koumba and Br'er Rabbit in the Afro-American Folk Tradition,”
in The Growth of African Literature: Twenty-five Years after Dakar and Fourah Bay
, ed. Edris Makward, Thelma Ravell-Pinto, and Aliko Songolo, Annual Selected Papers of the ALA 3 (Trenton, NJ
: Africa World Press
, 1998
), 249
–60
.28 See Henry Louis Gates Jr.,
The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of African-American Literary Criticism
(New York
: Oxford University Press
, 1988
), which is one of the most comprehensive treatments of the African Trickster, Eshu, as a theory of reading literature.29 See Musa W. Dube,
“The Subaltern Can Speak: Reading the Mmutle (Hare) Way,”
forthcoming in Journal of Africana Religions
, where I develop the Hare perspective of reading in detail.30 See Gada,
“Modern African Literature Revisited,”
281
.31 See Renita Weems,
“The Hebrew Women Are Not like the Egyptian Women: The Ideology of Race, Gender, and Sexual Reproduction in Exodus 1,”
Semeia
59
(1992
): 25
–34
.32 See Gada,
“Modern African Literature Revisited,”
281
.© 2015 Society of Biblical Literature
2015
Issue Section:
JBL Forum