Though written over a decade ago, Emilio DeGrazia’s talk struck me on two levels. The first is what it suggests about how we study drama but the other is how alike Wilder is to Arthur Miller in terms of their techniques and ambitions. How DeGrazia describes the way in which he eventually came to Wilder raises several ongoing concerns regarding the study of drama, which often feels like it is treated as the overlooked stepchild in the panoply of literature, despite its predating fiction by centuries. Few plays outside of Shakespeare are treated as truly “canonical” as they are usually given short shrift in most “Introduction to Literature” courses, despite their inherent teachability. Scholars in other fields (focusing on fiction, poetry, etc.) can overlook the complexity of how scholars discuss plays, as we need not only consider the written text, but also the performative aspects that include not only the...

You do not currently have access to this content.