In his book After Finitude, Quentin Meillassoux criticizes post-Kantian philosophy for its inability to explain how science is able to describe a world without human beings. This article addresses that challenge through a consideration of Heidegger's thought and his thinking about science. It is argued that the disagreement between Meillassoux and Heidegger comes down to a question of first philosophy and the priority of logic or ontology in philosophy. Ultimately, Heidegger's emphasis on ontology in philosophy is superior in its ability to give a more comprehensive account of science and thinking about things themselves.

You do not currently have access to this content.