Over the past forty years, the study of ancient, late antique, and medieval “magic” has become a burgeoning field. Scholars have benefited from the (revised) publication of substantial corpora of ancient grimoires and applied magical devices (especially amulets, curse tablets, and magic bowls),1 translations of magical materials,2 and a host of monographs, edited volumes, and essays on ancient magic and magicians.3 These studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of the nature and scope of premodern magic and its practitioners in diverse times (antiquity, late antiquity, and the medieval world), spaces (especially Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome), languages (for instance, Akkadian, Greek, Hebrew, and Latin), and religions (particularly, indigenous Egyptian religion, Greco–Roman religion[s], Judaism, Christianity, and Islam). Yet most of these studies provide either a general or synthetic analysis of magical texts and practices, or confine themselves to the manifestation of “magic” at a single historical instance...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Book Review|
March 01 2013
Continuity and Innovation in the Magical Tradition (Gideon Bohak, Yuval Harari, and Shaul Shaked, eds.)
Bohak, Gideon, Harari, Yuval, and Shaked, Shaul, eds.
Continuity and Innovation in the Magical Tradition
. Leiden and Boston
: Brill
, 2011
. Pp. 390. isbn978-90-04-20351-8.Preternature: Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural (2013) 2 (1): 105–112.
Citation
Joseph E. Sanzo; Continuity and Innovation in the Magical Tradition (Gideon Bohak, Yuval Harari, and Shaul Shaked, eds.). Preternature: Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural 1 March 2013; 2 (1): 105–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/preternature.2.1.0105
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Total Views
4
3
Pageviews
1
PDF Downloads
Since 3/1/2022