The contemporary American political landscape is littered with talk of apology. Throughout the 2012 presidential campaign, both camps sparred over when, why, and to whom apologies should be made. The most striking clash occurred in July 2012. The Obama camp ran a series of campaign advertisements alleging that the then presumptive Republican nominee had in fact remained at Bain Capitol in a leadership role longer than he had claimed, bolstering their characterization of Romney as a businessman whose business was not good for America.1 When Romney's aide failed to quiet the critique by claiming that the candidate had “retired retroactively” (DeLong 2012), Romney himself took to the airwaves to speak to the situation. On Friday, 13 July, he appeared on five different networks to condemn these types of attacks and to call for a campaign centered on issues, sidestepping the question of his tenure at Bain. In an...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
July 01 2013
Citation
Sarah Burgess; Obscene Demands. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 July 2013; 46 (3): 351–359. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.46.3.0351
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Total Views
4
3
Pageviews
1
PDF Downloads
Since 12/1/2021