ABSTRACT

Existing policy instruments for conserving tropical forests have shown limited success. This paper investigates the feasibility of improving the technical efficiency of the wood processing industry as an alternative approach to forest conservation, using sawmills in Sri Lanka as a case study. Improved wood processing efficiency decreases the volume of raw material (logs) required to produce a given quantity of processed wood products and, therefore, decreases the pressure on forests lands. A stochastic frontier production function was estimated to assess the technical efficiency of sawmilling in Sri Lanka. Given the considerable inefficiency found in sawmilling operations, current sawn wood output can be obtained with 28% less inputs. Compared with other policy measures, technical efficiency improvement has a potential to play a noteworthy role in conserving natural forests.

Notes

1.

The opinions reflected in this paper do not represent the views or the policies of the Asian Development Bank.

2.

These innovations include: (1) best open face technology, which optimizes the initial line for sawing; (2) edge-glue and rip method, which reduces the wood lost in edging; (3) saw-dry-rip method, which increases the defect-free lumber available from hardwoods; and (4) use of sharper and more stable blades, which can increase lumber recovery from logs by 5% to 10%.

3.

In Thailand, the average is 7000m3/year and in Indonesia it is 30 000 m3/year. Thus, the average output of a sawmill in Sri Lanka is lower than that of other Asian countries.

4.

Wastage here refers to using more inputs than necessary to produce the current output.

5.

The first regression equation estimates the production function to calculate efficiency scores.

6.

In general, protected natural forests are the least disturbed forests and historically remained intact due to high cost of timber extraction. In addition to the location and related high cost of harvesting protected forests, there are additional costs of being caught and punished for illegal logging. Such costs are highest for the protected forests.

The text of this article is only available as a PDF.

References

Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, Journal of Econometrics, 6, pp. 21–37.
Alauddin, M., Squires, D., & Tisdell, C. (1993) Divergency between average and frontier production technologies: An empirical investigation for Bangladesh, Applied Economics, 25, pp. 379–388.
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992) Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With applications to paddy farmers in India, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, pp. 153–169.
Boyd, R. G., & Krutilla, K. (1987) The welfare impacts of US trade restrictions against the Canadian softwood lumber industry: A spatial equilibrium analysis, Canadian Journal of Economics, 20, pp. 17–35.
Bravo-Ureta, B. E., & Pinheiro, A. E. (1993) Efficiency analysis of developing country agriculture: A review of the frontier function literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 22, pp. 88–101.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka (1997) Annual Report. Colombo: Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2006) Annual Report. Colombo: Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
Clarke, H. R., Reed, W. J., & Shrestha, R. M. (1993) Optimal enforcement of property rights on developing country forests subject to illegal logging, Resource and Energy Economics, 15, pp. 271–293.
Coelli, T. J. (1995) Recent developments in frontier modelling and efficiency measurement, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39(3), pp. 219–245.
Deacon, R. (1994) Deforestation and the rule of law in a cross-section of countries, Land Economics, 70(4), pp. 414–430.
Farrell, M. J. (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General), 120(3), pp. 253–290.
Gunatilake, H. M., & Gunaratne, L. H. P. (2002) Policy Options for Conserving Sri Lanka's Natural Forests EEPSEA Research Report No. 2002-RR2, Singapore: Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia.
Gunatilleke, I. A. U. N., & Gunatilleke, C. V. S. (1991) Threatened woody endemics of wet lowlands of Sri Lanka and their conservation, Biological Conservation, 55, pp. 17–36.
Hyde, W. F. (1980) Timber Supply, Land Allocation and Economic Efficiency (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future).
Hyde, W. F. (1997) Policies today and for the future, in: National Research Council Wood in our Future: The Role of Life-Cycle Analysis. Proceedings of a Symposium on Environmental Implications of Wood as a Raw Material for Industrial Use (Washington, DC: National Academy Press). Available at http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5734&page=92
Kotagama, H. B., Ranawana, S., Vidanage, S., & Dahanayake, U. (1997) Role of Economic Valuation, Environmental Impact Assessment: The Sri Lankan Experience, Center for Environmental Studies, University of Peradeniya, USAID/Sri Lanka Natural Resource and Environmental Policy Project.
Kumbhakar, S. C. (1996) Efficiency measurement with multiple output and multiple inputs, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, pp. 225–255.
Kumbhakar, S. C., Ghosh, S., and McGuckin, J. T. (1991) A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy farms, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 9(3), pp. 279–285.
Liu, J., Linderman, M., Ouyang, Z., An, L., Yang, J., & Zhang, H. (2001) Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas, Science, 292(5514), pp. 98–101.
Meeusen, W. & van den Broeck, J. (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composite error, International Economic Review, 18, pp. 435–444.
MFE (1995) Sri Lanka Forestry Sector Master Plan. Colombo: Ministry of Forestry and Environment, Sri Lanka.
Sedjo, R. A., & A. C. Wiseman (1983) The effectiveness of an export restriction on logs, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), pp. 113–116.
Seiford, L. M. (1996) Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995), Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, pp. 99–137.
Senaviratne, J., & Gunatilake, H. M. (2001) Can regulation of timber trade protect our forests? Department of National Planning, Colombo. Unpublished manuscript.
Victor, D. G., & Ausubel, J. H. (2000) Restoring the forests, Foreign Affairs, 79(6), pp. 127–44. Available at http://phe.rockefeller.edu/restoringforests/.
Weerahewa, J., & Gunatilake, H. (2006) Timber market liberalization in Sri Lanka: Implications for forest conservation, Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, 8, 1–20.
Wernick, I. K., Waggoner, P. E., & Ausubel, J. H. (1997) Searching for leverage to conserve forests: The industrial ecology of wood products in the United States, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(3), pp. 125–145.
Yin, R., & Newman, D. H. (1996) The effect of catastrophic risk on forest investment, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, pp. 186–197.
Zellner, A., Kmenta, J., & Dreze, J. (1966) Specification and estimation of production functions models, Econometrica, 34, pp. 784–795.
Zhang, D., Liu, J., Granskog, J., & Gan, J. (1998) China: Changing wood products markets, Food Products Journal, 49(6), pp. 14–20.