ABSTRACT
Using a comparative study of two social movements working against mass extinction, this essay examines how potential human extinction rhetorically creates connections between human life and other forms of life. Looking carefully at the role of species thinking in each movement, the essay argues for an approach it calls bioplurality, a way of understanding living things that attends to both similarity and difference.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for the History of Rhetoric
2020
American Society for the History of Rhetoric
Issue Section:
ARTICLES
You do not currently have access to this content.