In the spring and summer of 1919, contemporaries were convinced that they had been witnessing history in the making. The famous liberal historian Henrik Marczali made what we today would call the first “oral history” interview with Béla Kun, the de facto leader of the Republic of Councils.1 At the same time, but to a different end, the novelist Cécile Tormay was recording events as she saw them in her An Outlaw’s Diary.2 The battle over the sovereignty of interpretation (Deutungshoheit) of the recent past thus began even before the demise of the Republic of Councils at the end of July 1919. For the first several months after the collapse, its exiled leaders did not discuss the recent past; preoccupied by survival, the refugees, if they committed their thoughts to paper at all, focused their attention on the White Terror: on the paramilitary and mob...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
October 14 2020
Violence Glorified or Denied? Collective Memory of the Red and White Terrors in Hungary, 1919–Present
Hungarian Studies Review (2020) 46-47 (1): 44–54.
Citation
Béla Bodó; Violence Glorified or Denied? Collective Memory of the Red and White Terrors in Hungary, 1919–Present. Hungarian Studies Review 14 October 2020; 46-47 (1): 44–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/hungarianstud.46-47.1.0044
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Total Views
17
11
Pageviews
6
PDF Downloads
Since 1/1/2022