ABSTRACT
When faculty members think about curriculum, they think about course content. Debates about general education reflect this focus. Drawing on a case study, this article considers, rather, the politics and process of curricular change. It argues that success in this realm depends on the skill of academic administrators.
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Copyright © 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
2006
The Pennsylvania State University
You do not currently have access to this content.
