At the core of Bethany Wood's absorbing book, Women Adapting: Bringing Three Serials of the Roaring Twenties to Stage and Screen, lies what should be a self-evident claim: that adaptations, whether for stage or screen, emerge out of a complex process in which multiple individuals—not just a single author—participate. This process is shaped by specific historical, economic, and ideological conditions that “exert multidirectional pulls on [original] content” (209). And yet any cursory review of adaptation scholarship reveals that it generally neglects process and historical concerns, instead prioritizing analysis of the end-product in a vacuum. What gets forgotten or erased, Wood asks, when we stubbornly maintain this focus on textual analysis and fail to situate adaptations as the outcome of a historically determined process? For one, such methodology ignores the ways in which the industries commonly involved in adaptations—in the 1920s, this included periodical and book publishing, theater, and film—are...

You do not currently have access to this content.