Abstract
The aim of this article is to test whether the comparative cultural analysis of a critical text can provide a greater understanding of why Nyugat's editor, Miksa Fenyő, chose impressionistic criticism's highly aesthetic, yet seemingly quixotic approach to promote modern literature in Hungary, as opposed to selecting more conventional means.
Copyright © 2019 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.
2019
The Pennsylvania State University
You do not currently have access to this content.