Modern editions of medieval texts, with their cleanness and clarity, offer ease in reading yet often eliminate the interpretive signposts that would have guided the medieval reader: capitals, parafs, large rubrics, and smaller secondary rubrication. Because traditional editions do not (and, practically speaking, cannot) reproduce such features, these visual reading cues tend to remain invisible to us even when we are given the opportunity to see the page in its entirety. Rubrication is one of these visual cues. Most manuscripts that contain rubrication include two types: large red lettering used for Latin and textual divisions, and smaller red-ink touches on the regular ink. In this article I use “rubric” for the former and “rubrication” or “secondary rubrication” for the latter. Secondary rubrication includes dots, dashes, and underlining, all of which could be done quickly and without much pre-planning or expertise. Rubrication is one of the ways in which scribes structured...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 01 2013
Seeing Red:Reading Rubrication in Oxford, Corpus Christi College MS 201's Piers Plowman Available to Purchase
The Chaucer Review (2013) 47 (4): 439–464.
Citation
Noelle Phillips; Seeing Red:Reading Rubrication in Oxford, Corpus Christi College MS 201's Piers Plowman. The Chaucer Review 1 April 2013; 47 (4): 439–464. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.47.4.0439
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Total Views
4
4
Pageviews
0
PDF Downloads
Since 12/1/2021