During his public ministry, Jesus taught extensively in words and deeds about the kingdom of God. In How God Became King, N. T. Wright weds this material with Jesus’ self-sacrificial death to argue that God’s kingdom was also established by those words and deeds and, above all, by that death rather than by the force of arms. Growing out of this argument are an advocacy of pacifism, theocracy, and the divine right of human rulers, on the one hand, and a repudiation of democracy, the separation of church and state, and just war theory on the other hand. Undergirding these pros and cons is the use of Israel’s theocracy as a pattern to be followed in political engagement as part of Christians’ evangelistic enterprise. This review finds Wright’s arguments exegetically and biblically-theologically unconvincing.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| January 01 2014
An Exegetical and Biblical Theological Evaluation of N. T. Wright’s “How God Became King"
Bulletin for Biblical Research (2014) 24 (1): 57–73.
Robert H. Gundry; An Exegetical and Biblical Theological Evaluation of N. T. Wright’s “How God Became King". Bulletin for Biblical Research 1 January 2014; 24 (1): 57–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/26371225
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Total Views 8
8 PDF Downloads
Citing articles via
A Heresy of State:: Philip the Fair, the Trial of the “Perfidious Templars,” and the Pontificalization of the French Monarchy
Paulus als Yischmaelit? The Personification of Scripture as Interpretive Authority in Paul and the School of Rabbi Ishmael