Abstract
This article addresses the question of a possible dependence that is often claimed to exist between a postulated "Ur-Deuteronomium" and the so-called "Vassal Treaty of Esarhaddon" (VTE). It investigates the textual and reconstructed historical points of contact, concluding that the arguments brought forth in support of the dependence theory are not strong enough to recommend it. In the context of this investigation, the numerous important differences that separate VTE and Deuteronomy are highlighted.
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Copyright © 2009 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.
2009
The Pennsylvania State University
You do not currently have access to this content.