Abstract
In The Perfectionist Turn, Den Uyl and Rasmussen argue for an ethics of responsibility and oppose the prevailing ethics of respect. Political philosophy must be “tethered” ontologically, and arguments such as Moore’s open question argument that would, if correct, show that tethering is not possible do not succeed.
ethics, political philosophy, metaethics, ethics of responsibility, ethics of respect, tethering, open-question argument
Copyright © 2020 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.
2020
The Pennsylvania State University
You do not currently have access to this content.
