Abstract
Under R. M. Hare's interpretation of David Hume's is-ought gap, Hume thought it impossible to deduce an 'ought' conclusion, solely from 'is' premises. Ayn Rand rejects this view. In this paper, we see both how and why she attempted to deduce such an 'ought' conclusion in her ethical theory.
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Copyright © 2012 The Journal of Ayan Rand Studies Foundation
2012
The Journal of Ayan Rand Studies Foundation
You do not currently have access to this content.
